
When trying to shop more ethically, certifications and labels can feel like a lifeline, guiding you toward better choices in a sea of options. But while they can provide clarity and accountability, they’re not always as clear as they seem.
This section isn’t about telling you what’s ‘right’, it’s more about helping you reflect on how certifications work, where they might fall short, and how you might use them as part of a more mindful approach to spending.
✅ The Good: When Labels Lead Change
Some certifications genuinely raise the bar. By requiring businesses to meet specific standards around sustainability, labour rights, animal welfare, or environmental impact, they can:
- Improve working conditions and traceability
- Hold companies accountable to third-party oversight
- Offer transparency where little exists
- Create consumer pressure for better practices
Common examples include:
- Fairtrade – Focuses on better prices, working conditions, and fair terms for farmers and workers.
- B Corp Certification – Measures social and environmental performance across an entire business.
- Soil Association – Sets criteria for organic farming and processing.
- Cradle to Cradle – Encourages product design for circularity, health, and re-usability.

When applied rigorously, these standards can shift industries. But…
⚠️ The Nuance: Not All That Glitters Is Ethical
- Not all certifications are equal — some are robust and well-regarded, while others are self-issued or poorly enforced.
- Loopholes and exceptions often exist — companies may meet the minimum requirements while still engaging in questionable practices elsewhere.
- B Corps, for instance, has helped mainstream the idea of business for good, yet it’s also drawn criticism for awarding certification to large brands accused of unethical behaviour, raising concerns about dilution and credibility, although on balance they do seem to listen by iterating and correcting mistakes.
- Perverse incentives can arise — like investing more in marketing the label than improving actual practices.
Even strong labels can become part of a company’s ‘ethics PR’ used to deflect scrutiny from areas not covered by the certification.
👀 The Ugly: Greenwashing in Disguise?
Some logos and badges are designed to look official but are nothing more than self-created symbols. Without independent oversight or transparent criteria, they can mislead consumers and give a false sense of ethical reassurance.
Also, global certifications can fail to account for context, what’s good in one place might not translate ethically or environmentally somewhere else.

🤔 So, What Can We Do?
Use certifications as a starting point, not a full answer. Ask:
- What does this label actually guarantee, and what does it ignore?
- Who certifies the certifier? Is there independent oversight?
- Are these standards backed by lived experiences from the communities they claim to benefit?
You might find that in some cases, local producers without formal labels align more with your values than a certified multinational.
🌱 Outliers and Alternatives to Explore
Some promising or lesser-known schemes worth keeping an eye on:
- 1% for the Planet – Members commit to giving 1% of annual sales to environmental causes.
- Climate Neutral / Carbon Trust – Focused on carbon measurement and offsetting (though offsetting itself has critics).
- Ethical Consumer’s Best Buys – Independent ratings across a range of categories, often highlighting leaders and laggards.
An Invitation to be Curious, Not a Checklist
Certifications are tools not absolutes. They can help us spend more consciously, but they can’t replace thinking critically, asking questions, or staying curious.
Let this be less about perfection and more about presence. Knowing that every purchase has power, and every step is part of the journey.
And watch out for those sneaky labels…
